Research is a team sport: advancing the work when everyone does the research
Summary
As UX roles evolve amid AI tooling, democratized practices, and shifting org structures, many experienced researchers are spending less time conducting studies—and more time enabling others to do it well. In complex environments like healthcare, the question is no longer whether research should happen continuously, but who does it, when it happens, and how “good” it needs to be to move the work forward. In this lightning talk, James Wieselman Schulman shares how he’s helped build a culture where research isn’t reserved for specialists, but embedded throughout design and delivery. Drawing from service and healthcare design, he explores how cross-functional teams can engage in research responsibly—without lowering standards or losing sight of ethics, rigor, and trust. You’ll hear practical examples of how to: Use research continuously—not just at the start—to shape workshops, prototypes, MVPs, and business decisions; create clear guardrails so non-researchers can conduct meaningful (even if imperfect) research and learn through doing; redefine research ROI around impact, learning velocity, and organizational confidence, not methodological perfection The opportunity isn’t to replace expertise, but to extend it. When expert researchers shift from gatekeepers to coaches, they raise the floor for everyone, protect what makes research human, and ensure empathy remains at the center of the work. This session is for researchers, designers, and leaders navigating the shift from research doer to research enabler. It offers a pragmatic, human-centered view of research—one where five good conversations can be better than none, learning happens through action, and advancing the work matters more than protecting the role.
Key Insights
-
•
Resource constraints require us to involve non-researchers in conducting and experiencing research.
-
•
Democratizing empathy means getting designers, engineers, and product owners closer to real users.
-
•
Palchinsky’s principles—novelty, survivability, and learnability—offer a useful lens for scaling empathy via research.
-
•
Novel experiences with user research can help non-experts develop human-centered mindsets despite imperfect methods.
-
•
Survivability means enabling experimentation that doesn’t threaten project budgets or organizational stability.
-
•
A small amount of imperfect research by partners still yields valuable learning and maintains overall ROI.
-
•
Learnability depends on creating feedback loops where researchers coach and mentor collaborators.
-
•
Repeated practice with scaled research tasks helps non-researchers gain skills without risking critical projects.
-
•
Empathy often emerges more from the experience of doing or observing research than from insights alone.
-
•
Researchers should become organizational thought leaders guiding when and how to involve others in research.
Notable Quotes
"We are asked to produce more and more work with fewer people and smaller teams."
"How might we democratize empathy at scale within our organizations?"
"The goal is not methodological perfection; empathy is the end game."
"Even bad research can be good because it creates learning opportunities."
"Ten interviews is enough to get most of the way to meaningful insights."
"Getting partners involved in research may mean accepting some imperfect interviews."
"Research is something that should happen throughout the process — early and often."
"The most transformative part of research is being involved in the work itself."
"You have to find ways for people to practice so they can learn without destroying projects."
"Researchers can become thought leaders by coaching and mentoring others on empathy and research."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If it’s really important to you, you’ll find a way to prioritize it."
Laurent ChristophScale the impact of DesignOps in 3D: Diligence, Decision, Discipline
September 17, 2025
"A constitution is a very good exercise: write down your system’s principles and values to help guide its behavior."
Peter Van DijckHands-on AI #2: Understanding evals: LLM as a Judge
October 15, 2025
"If you get 10 people to follow, that’s a good sign your business has traction."
Eric ShumakeAn AMA on UX's Role in Healthcare
April 22, 2026
"Design definitely has a seat at the table. It may not be the most comfortable seat, but it is there."
Bob BaxleyTheme 4: Intro
January 8, 2024
"People are better equipped to decide and act in their lives when we deliver relevant and useful information."
Patrick Boehler Madison KarasThe service shift: transforming media organizations to create real value through design
November 19, 2025
"We’re really leaving half of our data on the table by not attending to gesture when eliciting mental models."
Dane DeSutter Stephanie ScopelitisWhat co-speech gestures reveal about users’ thinking during interviews
June 30, 2023
"Scaling qualitative analysis means managing large amounts of video and transcript data while preserving context and security."
Theresa MarwahHow Atlassian is Operationalizing Respect in Research
February 27, 2020
"Having one centralized repository aligned with our culture and values made the most sense for us."
Michelle Bejian Lotia Anne-Marie MorellRolling Out a Repository: How Zapier Centralizes Insights from Across their Organization
March 28, 2023
"If you’re a Theory X manager, you believe work is something people hate and must be controlled."
Sam LadnerData Exhaust and Personal Data: Learning from Consumer Products to Enhance Enterprise UX
June 8, 2016
