Summary
Learn about the concept testing methodology and various approaches available, when to use them, the types of decisions they can support, and the process to conduct good concept testing with mixed methodologies in mind.
Key Insights
-
•
Concept testing helps confirm the need for a product idea before development.
-
•
Different types of concept tests address various business questions and products.
-
•
The primary goal of concept testing is to prioritize product features based on user needs.
-
•
Qualitative research can enhance concept testing by identifying user motivations and behaviors.
-
•
Monadic tests focus on one concept, while sequential tests evaluate multiple concepts, allowing for nuanced insights.
-
•
Trade-off techniques like MaxDiff help prioritize product features efficiently.
-
•
Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches provides richer insights and better decision-making.
-
•
Advertising concepts are critical for understanding how to communicate product benefits effectively.
-
•
Concept testing should be integrated early in the product development process to ensure alignment with market needs.
-
•
Effective concept testing can justify resource allocation for UX research initiatives.
Notable Quotes
"Concept testing can bridge the gap between UX insights and business outcomes."
"Before investing in product development, we need to confirm there is a market need."
"Product features are less important than what those features do for the user."
"The ideal way to run concept testing is to combine qualitative and quantitative research."
"When testing concepts, clarify what is included in the description: the what, the why, and the how."
"MaxDiff is excellent for prioritizing features when you have a long list."
"Qualitative research uncovers user needs; quantitative research validates those findings."
"Trade-off techniques provide greater discriminatory power than rating scales."
"Concept testing can help save time and money by validating ideas before development."
"The effectiveness of concept testing relies on the careful selection of methods suited to the research objectives."
More Videos
"The earlier you consider inclusion, the less costly it is."
Samuel ProulxInvisible barriers: Why accessible service design can’t be an afterthought
December 3, 2024
"I hope that today, you are transformed."
Victor UdoewaTheme One Intro
March 27, 2023
"The success of our ROI approach depends mainly on the moment you are in within the organization."
Gonzalo GoyanesDesign ROI: Cover a Little, Get a Lot
September 8, 2022
"The future of technology shouldn't rest solely on the ethics of individual designers."
Alexandra SchmidtWhy Ethics Can't Save Tech
November 18, 2022
"We have to understand what the language of recognition is in our teams."
Jose CoronadoFrom Zero to Hero
September 8, 2022
"We need to redefine success criteria for our people."
Pippa LomasPaving the Path for Neurodiversity in Design
October 4, 2023
"There’s a need for a fresh set of eyes to challenge current practices in climate tech."
Louis Rosenfeld Matt Jones Olga Khroustaleva Michael Leggett Karol MunozDo you want to work on climate? (Climate UX Discussion Series)
November 15, 2023
"A designer juggling multiple teams has to decide which two people am I going to piss off today."
Jeff GothelfThe Intersection of Lean and Design
January 10, 2019
"Design tools aren't people; be careful that your tools don't replace relationships that are necessary."
Dave GrayGroup Activity: Making Sense of DesignOps
November 7, 2017
