Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Bridging the Gap Between Compliance and Design Quality
This video is featured in the UX Watch Party playlist.
Summary
After more than 20 years working in accessibility—including early accessibility projects, advocacy, education, and legislation efforts in Argentina—Santiago Bustelo believes that the missing piece is a better bridge between compliance and design practice.
In this session, he shares insights, experiments, and lessons from IPAX, an ongoing research initiative exploring the gap between accessibility compliance and accessibility adoption. The session examines why accessibility is often perceived as bureaucratic by design teams, why pair-based validation does not scale well to modern Design Systems, and whether accessibility could become easier to adopt if it also helps designers produce better design outcomes.
Key Insights
-
•
WCAG color contrast guidelines are outdated and sometimes promote poor design choices, like white on black causing visual strain for people with astigmatism.
-
•
Traditional color theory, based on a 200-year-old color wheel, is often at odds with modern accessibility needs and design quality.
-
•
Modern color models like Oklch and contrast scoring from APCA provide more precise assessments of accessible and ergonomic color combinations.
-
•
Santiago’s tool assigns scores from 1 to 5 to color combinations, balancing legal compliance with design quality to guide better choices.
-
•
Only a very limited set of colors work well against both black and white backgrounds, necessitating split color systems for accessibility.
-
•
Client resistance to changing brand color palettes for accessibility often stems from political and cultural attachment rather than technical limitations.
-
•
Presenting accessibility as enhancing brand usability for people over 40 or with common vision conditions can ease client pushback.
-
•
Responsive color systems that adapt colors across light, dark, and high-contrast modes can better serve diverse user needs.
-
•
Building accessible color systems is challenging but feasible if tools reduce the complexity and perceived risk of color adjustments.
-
•
Sustainable development of accessibility tools may require nonprofit structures and open-source licenses to attract funding and wider adoption.
Notable Quotes
"Every mistake you see is their fault. Every mistake's an opportunity, though."
"WCAG says the more contrast, the merrier, but bright white on black can actually cause ghost images for astigmatism."
"There are only two perfect neutral grays that work accessible both against black and white."
"WCAG says it depends, but doesn’t really help you decide what large text or bold means in practice."
"We can have many accents, each split into two shades for light and dark backgrounds to keep accessibility without breaking brand."
"If clients say they don’t care about accessibility, it’s a political problem, not a technical one."
"The system I’m building helps show clients that almost imperceptible color adjustments can make their brand accessible."
"Accessibility is often misunderstood as for a very small population, but most adults have some vision issues."
"Sustaining this kind of work isn’t profitable, but it’s valuable for the community."
"Forming a nonprofit could unlock funding to continue and grow this accessibility tool."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"There is no one right way to do things; this is deeply contextual work."
Matt LeMayYou Don’t “Get” Anyone to Do Anything
December 6, 2022
"We’re showing people how to collaborate like crazy and how to fail gracefully."
Phil GilbertA Consistent Culture of Design
May 14, 2015
"This conference is more than a snapshot; it’s a part of a year-round conversation and community."
Louis RosenfeldWelcome / Housekeeping
June 6, 2023
"Discomfort should not be dismissed; it’s a signpost for necessary change."
Rachael Dietkus, LCSWThe power to heal and harm
March 13, 2025
"Prioritizing insights helps pull together top reports aligned with what leadership is focused on next."
Jake BurghardtFinding More Inroads into Research Impact
February 20, 2026
"It’s impossible for any single researcher or manager to identify all cross-functional impact opportunities alone."
Fatimah RichmondThe Future of ReOps as a Strategic Function: A Roadmap for Getting There
March 25, 2024
"They wouldn’t tell us what the requirements were; it was our job to figure it out."
Joshua GravesWe Need To Talk: Managing Ludicrous Requests at Work (Part 3 of 3)
May 12, 2025
"Depersonalizing the situation is a huge winner in nearly any hard conversation."
Joshua GravesWe Need To Talk: Navigating Conversations with Your Boss (Part 1 of 3)
April 14, 2025
"The urgent and important stuff competes with the important but not urgent, and we have to sort that out."
Harry MaxPriority Zero: Some Things are More Equal than Others
June 9, 2016
