Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Bridging the Gap Between Compliance and Design Quality
Summary
Many designers experience accessibility as a compliance exercise disconnected from design practice. That's a design problem. After more than 20 years working in accessibility—including early accessibility projects, advocacy, education, and legislation efforts in Argentina—Santiago Bustelo believes that the missing piece is a better bridge between compliance and design practice. In this session, he shares insights, experiments, and lessons from IPAX, an ongoing research initiative exploring the gap between accessibility compliance and accessibility adoption. The session examines why accessibility is often perceived as bureaucratic by design teams, why pair-based validation does not scale well to modern Design Systems, and whether accessibility could become easier to adopt if it also helps designers produce better design outcomes.
Key Insights
-
•
WCAG color contrast guidelines are outdated and sometimes promote poor design choices, like white on black causing visual strain for people with astigmatism.
-
•
Traditional color theory, based on a 200-year-old color wheel, is often at odds with modern accessibility needs and design quality.
-
•
Modern color models like Oklch and contrast scoring from APCA provide more precise assessments of accessible and ergonomic color combinations.
-
•
Santiago’s tool assigns scores from 1 to 5 to color combinations, balancing legal compliance with design quality to guide better choices.
-
•
Only a very limited set of colors work well against both black and white backgrounds, necessitating split color systems for accessibility.
-
•
Client resistance to changing brand color palettes for accessibility often stems from political and cultural attachment rather than technical limitations.
-
•
Presenting accessibility as enhancing brand usability for people over 40 or with common vision conditions can ease client pushback.
-
•
Responsive color systems that adapt colors across light, dark, and high-contrast modes can better serve diverse user needs.
-
•
Building accessible color systems is challenging but feasible if tools reduce the complexity and perceived risk of color adjustments.
-
•
Sustainable development of accessibility tools may require nonprofit structures and open-source licenses to attract funding and wider adoption.
Notable Quotes
"Every mistake you see is their fault. Every mistake's an opportunity, though."
"WCAG says the more contrast, the merrier, but bright white on black can actually cause ghost images for astigmatism."
"There are only two perfect neutral grays that work accessible both against black and white."
"WCAG says it depends, but doesn’t really help you decide what large text or bold means in practice."
"We can have many accents, each split into two shades for light and dark backgrounds to keep accessibility without breaking brand."
"If clients say they don’t care about accessibility, it’s a political problem, not a technical one."
"The system I’m building helps show clients that almost imperceptible color adjustments can make their brand accessible."
"Accessibility is often misunderstood as for a very small population, but most adults have some vision issues."
"Sustaining this kind of work isn’t profitable, but it’s valuable for the community."
"Forming a nonprofit could unlock funding to continue and grow this accessibility tool."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Equity is equal outcomes, not just equal access to a bicycle everyone can’t necessarily ride."
Jennifer StricklandAdopting a "Design By" Method
December 9, 2021
"Designing services increasingly span these blurred lines between our digital and public worlds."
Sarah BrooksTheme Three Intro
November 18, 2022
"We gave away the recipe with no fee for entry – immediate value first, then learning the process."
Matt StoneScaling Empathy, A Case Study in Change Management
June 11, 2021
"We’re building in the attribution of ideas to authors and speakers, emphasizing the humans behind the expertise."
Peter Van Dijck Louis RosenfeldCoffee with Lou #4: Taking a Peek Under the Rosenbot's Hood
June 14, 2024
"The modern corporation decouples accountability from territory and functions as arbitrage machines with no one truly responsible."
Dave GrayConnection, Community, and the Future of Work
May 28, 2026
"Accessibility and research are part of our org, not just consultants, which makes a huge difference in quality."
Luca RagerEmpowering Gaming at Scale: How Xbox Builds Powerful, Automated, and Distributed Design Systems with Sketch
September 30, 2021
"Compliance is everyone's concern but no one's responsibility."
Patrizia BertiniThe (r)evolution of designOps: It’s Time to Think (really) BIG
September 11, 2025
"Craft means intent and care even in digital products; for example, the bounce animation of Google Maps’ pin shows someone cared."
Uday Gajendar Adam RichardsonFrom AI to Zeitgeist: Theory as the design antidote to AI hype
March 27, 2025
"We focus on getting top quality participants and let others specialize in testing or analysis tools."
Benjamin Wiedmaier Annie MayfieldRedefining Toolkits: Unbundling to Create a Perfect Match
March 11, 2025
