Rosenverse
Shitty Maps: A Trojan Horse for Sensemaking

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Shitty Maps: A Trojan Horse for Sensemaking

Thursday, July 9, 2026 • Rosenfeld Community

This video is featured in the Learning playlist and 1 more.

Share the love for this talk
Shitty Maps: A Trojan Horse for Sensemaking
Speakers: Joe Elmendorf
Link:

Summary

You’ve made shitty-looking maps before. The rough sketch on a napkin while you were figuring out what you actually thought. The boxes-and-arrows scrawl on a whiteboard that helped the room land somewhere. The marginal doodle that did more work than the deck it sat next to. You probably hid them, or threw them away, or recreated them somewhere fancier or “more acceptable” before showing anyone.
This session is about not doing that anymore.
Polish is a trap. A finished-looking map either gets waved through—it looks done, so it must be right–or the room balks because they weren’t part of figuring it out. Either way, your map is treated as something fixed, and the thinking stops. The rough version doesn’t have that problem. It stays in motion. It invites the room in. And it’s faster than the “real” tools, which only feel fast because they look legitimate while you’re using them.
We’ll dig into why looking shitty works, then practice making rough maps together, and the skill behind the practice that makes the whole thing come together.

Key Insights

  • •

    Rough, low-fidelity 's****y maps' reduce social risk and invite collaborative iteration rather than confrontation.

  • •

    Visual representations persist in conversation, help point to relationships, and map non-linear concepts better than spoken language.

  • •

    Power dynamics and inadequate communication mediums often inhibit people from sharing valuable perspectives in meetings.

  • •

    Practicing real-time visual thinking with simple tools like note cards builds muscle memory that helps break conversational stalemates.

  • •

    'S****y maps' serve as Trojan horses that sneak clarity into conversations without requiring permission or pretense.

  • •

    The posture of presenting rough maps as drafts with invitation to correction reduces ego and resistance in group settings.

  • •

    High-fidelity polished designs can shut down discussion by implying settled ideas, whereas rough sketches encourage exploration.

  • •

    Visual sense-making is a powerful tool for sense-making, trust-building, and aligning stakeholders beyond verbal explanations.

  • •

    AI-generated visualizations can augment conversation but often lack the human vulnerability and fluidity of hand-drawn sketches.

  • •

    Breaking down complex problems into smaller chunks visually helps transform overwhelming issues into manageable tasks.

Notable Quotes

"Everything that I make looks s****y. How can I turn this into a benefit?"

"The map on the note card wasn’t calling anyone out. It was providing this shared point of reference."

"If something looks rough, people don’t treat it like a declaration. They treat it like a draft."

"Talking is linear, but systems are non-linear. Visual maps show those relationships that words can’t."

"I didn’t magically have crystal-clear thoughts. I changed the conditions just enough."

"S****y maps are a Trojan horse for sense-making because they’re disarming and inviting."

"The willingness to say, ‘I’m not sure this is right, but is this what we’re talking about?’ That is a s****y map."

"Visual sketching shows human vulnerability in a way that AI cannot."

"High-fidelity maps often squash discussion. Rough maps invite it."

"That pen on paper helps your brain think through ideas faster."

Ask the Rosenbot
Lena Shenkarenko
Collaborative Wireframing for Creating Team Alignment and Shipping Better Products
2020 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Dr. Jamika Burge
Embracing change: Navigating shifting landscapes with compassion and agency
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Liwei Dai
The Heart and Brain of the AI Research
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Christian Crumlish
AMA with Christian Crumlish, author of Product Management for UX People
2022 • Enterprise Community
Josh Clark
Sentient Design: Crafting Intelligent Interfaces with AI
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Mackenzie Cockram
Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Research from Discovery to Live
2022 • QuantQual Interest Group
You’ve got Gold! A Rosenverse demo with Lou Rosenfeld
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Sahibzada Mayed
Cultivating Design Ecologies of Care, Community, and Collaboration
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Scott Stephens
The Next Generation in DesignOps Toolsets
2022 • DesignOps Community
Victor Udoewa
Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Ned Gartside
Navigating accessibility and climate
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Ebru Namaldi
Designing the Designer’s Journey: Scaling Teams, Culture, and Growth Through DesignOps
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Alexandra Schmidt
Why Ethics Can't Save Tech
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Alicia D. Johnson
Disasters and the 21st Century
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Alexis Lucio
Scaling Accessibility Through Design Systems
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Dan Mall
“Ask Me Anything” with Dan Mall, Author of Upcoming Rosenfeld Title, Design that Scales
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold

More Videos

Susan Simon-Daniels

"Never assume and always ask why."

Susan Simon-Daniels

War Stories LIVE! Susan Simon-Daniels

March 30, 2020

Sharon Bautista

"It's commonplace for at least two browsers to be available because some critical web-based tools work on some browsers and not on others."

Sharon Bautista

Time to Make the Donuts: How User Research Helped Bridge Disparate Teams

January 8, 2024

David Cronin

"The three-in-the-box model means having marketing, engineering, and UX leaders working collaboratively."

David Cronin Uday Gajendar Peter Morville Kendra Shimmell

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Jemma Ahmed

"This transformation is a win-win: we demonstrate solid business value and serve people and stories in more ethical and impactful ways."

Jemma Ahmed Megan Blocker Eduardo Ortiz

Redefining the research toolkit: Expanding methodologies for a changing world

March 12, 2025

George Hinchliffe

"We’re drinking our own champagne—using our products internally months before release to stress test and improve them."

George Hinchliffe Joy Liu

Delivering Amazing Experiences

June 10, 2021

Stefanie Owens

"Build better foundations, not better facades."

Stefanie Owens

Optimizing for Outcomes: Transformation Design in Systems at Scale

December 4, 2024

Steve Baty

"Minimum viable product has become the minimal thing you can do to get out in the world, but doesn’t necessarily satisfy the needs of people you’re serving."

Steve Baty Richard Dalton Maria Giudice Harry Max

Discussion

June 9, 2016

Ryan Matthew

"AI-generated components maintain end-to-end system quality while developers focus on functionality."

Ryan Matthew Alex Kurchev

Bridging Design and Code: AI-Powered Design System Integration

September 11, 2025

Laura Weiss

"Conflict occurs when something important to us feels threatened or disrespected."

Laura Weiss

Turn Down the Heat: 3 Ways to Handle Conflict in the Moment

November 20, 2024