Summary
In this interactive session, Sam Proulx, accessibility evangelist at Fable, will draw from experience as a person with a disability, and from Fable’s thousands of hours of research experience, to answer all of your questions about conducting prototype reviews with people with disabilities. What design systems work best? What disabilities can participate in prototype reviews out of the box, and what types of disabilities might need special adaptations? What information should a prototype contain, to get the best feedback and engagement from people with disabilities? How can you and your organization learn to better shift left, and involve people with disabilities as early as possible in the design process, and why should you? We’ll also have plenty of time for your own questions! If you’ve been wanting to conduct prototype reviews that involve people with disabilities, but weren’t quite sure where to begin, don’t miss this session!
Key Insights
-
•
Starting prototype reviews with screen magnification users offers high impact with minimal adaptation.
-
•
Screen magnification users benefit from graphical prototypes because they can magnify visuals and assess color contrast and text size directly.
-
•
Users with physical challenges may need researchers to operate prototypes on their behalf due to assistive tech limitations, especially with hover and click targets.
-
•
Screen reader users require prototypes with semantic markup like proper heading levels, labeled controls, and landmarks, which traditional wireframes usually lack.
-
•
Prototyping tools like Figma and Adobe currently have limited accessibility support for screen reader users but are actively researching improvements.
-
•
Building prototypes for screen reader users often involves using document-based tools like Microsoft Word or Google Docs to show semantic structure and text equivalents.
-
•
Hover interactions pose significant challenges for users relying on alternative navigation methods such as switch systems or head mice.
-
•
Control labeling consistency in prototypes is crucial to avoid confusion, particularly for those using voice dictation or alternative input.
-
•
Low vision users who do not fully rely on screen readers are the largest group benefiting from improved prototype accessibility.
-
•
Mobile accessibility considerations largely mirror desktop concerns, with screen size and gesture differences being the main changes.
Notable Quotes
"Including people with disabilities in prototype reviews can be different based on the assistive technology they use and their needs."
"Screen magnification is really about making the screen larger, changing color contrast, reducing motion, and panning around the magnified area."
"Screen magnification users are a great place to start because your prototypes and tools will mostly just work with minimal adaptation."
"Users with physical challenges often can see and interpret prototypes but may need help clicking through them because assistive tech may not support the prototype system."
"Screen reader users need semantic structure that graphical prototypes typically don’t have, like labeled headings, controls, tables, and landmarks."
"For screen reader users, you often need to build entirely new prototypes using systems like Microsoft Word or Google Docs to convey semantic information."
"Hover is very difficult for users who use switch systems or head mice because they can only click or not click and have trouble holding steady to hover."
"Consistency between control labels and prototype instructions matters a lot, because mismatches can cause big problems for alternative navigation."
"Most of the work on accessible prototyping for screen readers is still in early or mid research stages but is improving rapidly."
"Involving people with disabilities throughout the product development cycle is crucial, from prototype reviews through to acceptance testing."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If you have problems with Slack or the conference experience, please contact the help desk customer service."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
November 18, 2022
"Designers are creating conditions in which systems can grow, learn, and thrive—moving beyond just solving problems to meta-design."
Hugh DubberlyProblems with Problems: Reconsidering the Frame of Designing as Problem-Solving
June 19, 2019
"The division between haves and have-nots is real, but history shows periods of immense innovation and progress can follow."
April ReaganLook, Think, Act: The Futures-Smart Design Organization
October 1, 2021
"Cluster analysis will definitely replace personas, the fictional personas of course."
Ricardo MartinsUnlocking the power of advanced quantitative methods
March 12, 2025
"Giving the whole team access to feedback made them feel responsible and inspired to solve user needs."
Maria SkaadenContinuous Design: One eye on the horizon and the other on the next wave
November 8, 2018
"Feedback is more like an investment and a contribution into not just the person's work, but also to their growth."
Vanessa VarinFeedback: The Other F-Word
September 10, 2025
"We set a goal to fill 25% of our early career roles with underrepresented demographics and landed 37%."
Jen Crim Jess Quittner Saritha Kattekola Alex Karr Gurbani PahwaCulture, DIBS & Recruiting
June 11, 2021
"Humans remain essential for evaluation, especially to interpret cultural nuance that AI often misses."
Patrick BoehlerFishing for Real Needs: Reimagining Journalism Needs with AI
June 10, 2025
"Our customer conference booth was strategically located by the men’s room to catch traffic from hardcore enterprise IT folks."
Julie BaherCulture Change—My Journey
May 14, 2015
