Summary
In this interactive session, Sam Proulx, accessibility evangelist at Fable, will draw from experience as a person with a disability, and from Fable’s thousands of hours of research experience, to answer all of your questions about conducting prototype reviews with people with disabilities. What design systems work best? What disabilities can participate in prototype reviews out of the box, and what types of disabilities might need special adaptations? What information should a prototype contain, to get the best feedback and engagement from people with disabilities? How can you and your organization learn to better shift left, and involve people with disabilities as early as possible in the design process, and why should you? We’ll also have plenty of time for your own questions! If you’ve been wanting to conduct prototype reviews that involve people with disabilities, but weren’t quite sure where to begin, don’t miss this session!
Key Insights
-
•
Starting prototype reviews with screen magnification users offers high impact with minimal adaptation.
-
•
Screen magnification users benefit from graphical prototypes because they can magnify visuals and assess color contrast and text size directly.
-
•
Users with physical challenges may need researchers to operate prototypes on their behalf due to assistive tech limitations, especially with hover and click targets.
-
•
Screen reader users require prototypes with semantic markup like proper heading levels, labeled controls, and landmarks, which traditional wireframes usually lack.
-
•
Prototyping tools like Figma and Adobe currently have limited accessibility support for screen reader users but are actively researching improvements.
-
•
Building prototypes for screen reader users often involves using document-based tools like Microsoft Word or Google Docs to show semantic structure and text equivalents.
-
•
Hover interactions pose significant challenges for users relying on alternative navigation methods such as switch systems or head mice.
-
•
Control labeling consistency in prototypes is crucial to avoid confusion, particularly for those using voice dictation or alternative input.
-
•
Low vision users who do not fully rely on screen readers are the largest group benefiting from improved prototype accessibility.
-
•
Mobile accessibility considerations largely mirror desktop concerns, with screen size and gesture differences being the main changes.
Notable Quotes
"Including people with disabilities in prototype reviews can be different based on the assistive technology they use and their needs."
"Screen magnification is really about making the screen larger, changing color contrast, reducing motion, and panning around the magnified area."
"Screen magnification users are a great place to start because your prototypes and tools will mostly just work with minimal adaptation."
"Users with physical challenges often can see and interpret prototypes but may need help clicking through them because assistive tech may not support the prototype system."
"Screen reader users need semantic structure that graphical prototypes typically don’t have, like labeled headings, controls, tables, and landmarks."
"For screen reader users, you often need to build entirely new prototypes using systems like Microsoft Word or Google Docs to convey semantic information."
"Hover is very difficult for users who use switch systems or head mice because they can only click or not click and have trouble holding steady to hover."
"Consistency between control labels and prototype instructions matters a lot, because mismatches can cause big problems for alternative navigation."
"Most of the work on accessible prototyping for screen readers is still in early or mid research stages but is improving rapidly."
"Involving people with disabilities throughout the product development cycle is crucial, from prototype reviews through to acceptance testing."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"When fellow co-workers label an individual as difficult, it's hard not to treat that individual as a problem."
Darian DavisLessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
January 8, 2024
"We built an equity learning community with 25 virtual sessions, 4 interagency roundtables, and one-on-one consultations with 37 agencies."
Aaron Stienstra Lashanda HodgeLeveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government
December 8, 2021
"Assistive technology can feel like another person in the room during a research session, which you have to understand and include."
Kavana RameshMeaningful inclusion: Practicing accessibility research with confidence
September 24, 2024
"Humans tend to give too much authority to autonomous systems, which can lead to overtrust."
Helen ArmstrongAugment the Human. Interrogate the System.
June 7, 2023
"There are competing variants in UX adoption like competing virus strains that can slow down change."
Scott PlewesWhy Isn't Your UX Approach Going Viral?: A Mathematical Model
March 28, 2023
"We have to design not just for humans but for other life forms on this planet."
Christian BasonExpand—Rethinking Design for Public Challenges
September 14, 2022
"Tool use lets the model decide itself when to call external APIs or services to get needed information."
Peter Van DijckBuilding impactful AI products for design and product leaders, Part 3: Understand AI architectures: RAG, Agents, Oh My!
July 30, 2025
"Semiotics isn’t just words and pictures; it includes every stimulus in your waking and even perhaps sleeping life."
Soma Ghosh Savina Hawkins Dave Hoffer Rob Thomas Victor UdoewaWhat emerging methods are advancing UX research [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
September 28, 2023
"Mixed methodologies illustrate the richness of our profession, showing the value of different types of research."
Steve Portigal Susan Simon-Daniels Tamara Hale Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Q&A-Discussion
March 30, 2020
