This video is featured in the AI and UX playlist and 1 more.
Summary
Our team at Gazzetta, a media research lab, is tackling a fundamental challenge in journalism: the disconnect between media output and community needs, particularly in restricted or distorted information environments of autocracies. We have learnt over the past years that traditional audience research has led to quant-heavy, superficial understanding, ineffective content and, ultimately, irrelevance. To address this problem, we have developed a three-stage process using AI knowledge bases to build empathy, map information needs, and analyze information flows. We have used this process to systematically review multiple information sources to build deep community understanding before product development. This methodology has helped us preserve nuance, identify knowledge gaps, and assign confidence levels to findings. Rather than treating AI as a black box solution, a thoughtful process-oriented approach can help us better understand and serve information needs, and gradually rebuild relevance.
Key Insights
-
•
AI combined with structured research queries reveals deeper insights than traditional research when direct user access is limited.
-
•
Misalignment often exists between what organizations believe users need and what users actually need, as shown by North Korean fishermen preferring weather forecasts over political news.
-
•
Traditional engagement metrics only measure surface behavior, failing to capture true user information needs and satisfaction.
-
•
A shift from a theory of change (assuming known needs) to a theory of service (starting with understanding actual needs) is fundamental to effective media strategy and user-centered design.
-
•
A three-stage research approach—building empathy, prioritizing information gaps, and analyzing information flows—helps systematically leverage complex and scattered data.
-
•
Confidence rating of sources and insights is essential to prevent false certainty from AI-generated outputs.
-
•
Structured queries and systematic frameworks outperform opportunistic or freeform AI interactions, avoiding common pitfalls like overgeneralization and poor prompt design.
-
•
Human expertise, especially cultural knowledge, is indispensable to interpret AI outputs and maintain nuance.
-
•
Research repositories often hold untapped treasure troves of insights that, with structure and AI, can be mined even on shoestring budgets.
-
•
Visual coding of insights by confidence level improves transparency and decision-making among stakeholders.
Notable Quotes
"Journalists like me are in the business of interrogating reality to get at the truth."
"Those fishermen didn’t want political news—they wanted reliable weather forecasts to stay safe at sea."
"We spend millions on content that nobody wanted and that didn’t actually help people navigate their lives."
"Traditional metrics create a dangerous illusion where we optimize for what we can measure, not what people actually need."
"We’re moving from theory of change to theory of service: starting with what people actually need before creating anything."
"The careful application of structured queries can reveal deeper insights than traditional research alone."
"AI systems can present speculative connections as established facts, so confidence ratings are critical."
"Structure beats free form interaction—systematic query frameworks are essential to avoid pitfalls."
"Humans remain essential for evaluation, especially to interpret cultural nuance that AI often misses."
"Finding meaningful insights is not just casting a wide net—it requires discipline, structure, and knowing where to fish."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Psychological safety isn’t created by an initiative but through a thousand tiny habits in language and behavior."
Stephen AndersonPuzzled? How to Coordinate Humans for Complex Challenges
May 27, 2021
"Sending small care packages to remote team members goes a long way in showing we care and building connection."
Jilanna WilsonDistributed Design Operations Management
October 23, 2019
"I know who you are and I have opinions."
Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Randy Duke II
March 30, 2020
"Co-planning means building trust and relationships before planning the project itself as a blended team."
Natalia RadywylCo-Designing New Power in Australia's Public Sector
November 16, 2022
"You can't just measure ethics like a scientific question; you have to reason differently."
Cennydd BowlesExit Interview #2: Rediscovering the ethical heart of design
November 6, 2025
"Choosing a research repository is a big battle in your organization; the right decisions can really help you succeed."
Sofia QuinteroThe Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ
March 10, 2021
"The real shift wasn’t speed, it was also trust."
Bethany BrownRewiring operations with service design and AI
November 20, 2025
"The edit rate, our metric of human-added characters over total characters, tracks AI output quality without burdening users."
Jennifer KongJourneying toward AI-assisted documentation in healthcare
June 5, 2024
"People care about titles way too much. I had a guy whose business card said star-bellied sneak—love that."
Ian SwinsonDesigning and Driving UX Careers
June 8, 2016
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How can organizations create a democratization charter that fits their regulatory and organizational needs?
How can one service designer drive AI integration in an organization lacking a design team?
What are common challenges media teams face when trying to implement strategic, service-oriented approaches?