Fishing for Real Needs: Reimagining Journalism Needs with AI
This video is featured in the Designing with AI 2025 playlist and 2 more.
Summary
Our team at Gazzetta, a media research lab, is tackling a fundamental challenge in journalism: the disconnect between media output and community needs, particularly in restricted or distorted information environments of autocracies. We have learnt over the past years that traditional audience research has led to quant-heavy, superficial understanding, ineffective content and, ultimately, irrelevance. To address this problem, we have developed a three-stage process using AI knowledge bases to build empathy, map information needs, and analyze information flows. We have used this process to systematically review multiple information sources to build deep community understanding before product development. This methodology has helped us preserve nuance, identify knowledge gaps, and assign confidence levels to findings. Rather than treating AI as a black box solution, a thoughtful process-oriented approach can help us better understand and serve information needs, and gradually rebuild relevance.
Key Insights
-
•
AI combined with structured research queries reveals deeper insights than traditional research when direct user access is limited.
-
•
Misalignment often exists between what organizations believe users need and what users actually need, as shown by North Korean fishermen preferring weather forecasts over political news.
-
•
Traditional engagement metrics only measure surface behavior, failing to capture true user information needs and satisfaction.
-
•
A shift from a theory of change (assuming known needs) to a theory of service (starting with understanding actual needs) is fundamental to effective media strategy and user-centered design.
-
•
A three-stage research approach—building empathy, prioritizing information gaps, and analyzing information flows—helps systematically leverage complex and scattered data.
-
•
Confidence rating of sources and insights is essential to prevent false certainty from AI-generated outputs.
-
•
Structured queries and systematic frameworks outperform opportunistic or freeform AI interactions, avoiding common pitfalls like overgeneralization and poor prompt design.
-
•
Human expertise, especially cultural knowledge, is indispensable to interpret AI outputs and maintain nuance.
-
•
Research repositories often hold untapped treasure troves of insights that, with structure and AI, can be mined even on shoestring budgets.
-
•
Visual coding of insights by confidence level improves transparency and decision-making among stakeholders.
Notable Quotes
"Journalists like me are in the business of interrogating reality to get at the truth."
"Those fishermen didn’t want political news—they wanted reliable weather forecasts to stay safe at sea."
"We spend millions on content that nobody wanted and that didn’t actually help people navigate their lives."
"Traditional metrics create a dangerous illusion where we optimize for what we can measure, not what people actually need."
"We’re moving from theory of change to theory of service: starting with what people actually need before creating anything."
"The careful application of structured queries can reveal deeper insights than traditional research alone."
"AI systems can present speculative connections as established facts, so confidence ratings are critical."
"Structure beats free form interaction—systematic query frameworks are essential to avoid pitfalls."
"Humans remain essential for evaluation, especially to interpret cultural nuance that AI often misses."
"Finding meaningful insights is not just casting a wide net—it requires discipline, structure, and knowing where to fish."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We want to prevent our community from the dehumanizing impulses often brought on by bureaucratic scaling."
Bud Caddell Kristin Skinner Alana WashingtonDesignOps Community Sensing Session
May 13, 2021
"Getting weird in Miro lets people play and connect remotely without pressure to prepare or present."
Shipra Kayan Tess DixonHow Tess Dixon Facilitates Team Engagement and Collaboration at Condé Nast Using Miro
October 1, 2021
"Technical difficulties happen, so please use hashtag.deo help within our Slack channel or email for support."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
September 29, 2021
"I believe design teams should lead with the customer inside and out instead of any one discipline leading."
John Maeda Alison RandAbout Design Organizations
May 13, 2019
"You are either navigating with a white cane or a service dog because you are not gonna want both of your hands full."
Kate KalcevichDesigning inclusively with AI
June 5, 2024
"The absence of feedback during design demos was a red flag — we missed information and had to realign quickly."
Frank DuranPartnership Playbook: Lessons Learned in Effective Partnership
January 8, 2024
"The alert Julie received didn’t apply to her and didn’t affect her morning commute."
Kristin TaylorBuilding Bridges Across Organizational Silos
November 18, 2022
"Life has a way of working itself out."
Maria GiudiceEmpowering change: Reigniting purpose, passion and impact in research
March 13, 2025
"Persisting conversations in Slack instead of Zoom chat means folks can revisit and join conversations asynchronously."
Shelby SwitzerMaking Space for Community Knowledge-sharing in a Distributed World
December 10, 2021
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
In what ways does the Rosenbot promote self-directed, on-demand learning for UX professionals?
How do you ensure a product vision is grounded in customer pain points and business opportunities?
What are effective behaviors that design operations teams should focus on to deliver value and build trust?