Innovation Studios: the Engines of Enterprise Experimentation
Summary
In this talk, Jeff Gothelf discusses the widespread corporate pursuit of innovation in the face of disruption from nimble startups. Using examples like New Coke, Amazon Fire Phone, and Nordstrom's innovation lab, Jeff highlights how many large companies misunderstand innovation as a quick fix or a side project. He distinguishes between sustaining innovation, which improves existing products, and disruptive innovation, which creates entirely new business models leveraging core competencies. Jeff critiques popular corporate innovation efforts such as hackathons and innovation labs, explaining why they often fail due to lack of strategic alignment, incentives, ownership, and integration with core business units. Drawing on his experience at AOL and examples from Adobe’s Kickbox initiative, Jeff presents the innovation studio as a superior approach. This studio integrates leadership, long-term funding, cross-functional entrepreneurial teams, radical transparency, and genuine ownership—where teams take equity and carry winning ideas into new business lines or spinouts. He emphasizes patience of 18 months to three years and the need to publicly share both successes and failures to build a culture of experimentation. Jeff concludes that an innovation studio not only drives disruptive innovation outcomes but also improves sustaining innovation practices across the enterprise.
Key Insights
-
•
Many high-profile corporate innovation failures (e.g., New Coke, Amazon Fire Phone) stem from misunderstanding innovation as a superficial add-on rather than a strategic practice.
-
•
Disruptive innovation differs fundamentally from sustaining innovation; it focuses on creating new business models, not just shipping features.
-
•
Hackathons, while popular, are short-term events that rarely result in meaningful disruptive innovation due to lack of ongoing incentives and integration.
-
•
Innovation labs often fail because they operate in isolation from corporate strategy and struggle to hand off ideas to productization teams incentivized differently.
-
•
Nordstrom and eBay both shut down innovation labs to instead embed innovation as a corporate-wide value.
-
•
Adobe’s Kickbox program encourages experimentation across employees but falls short for disruptive innovation as it is part-time and lacks strategic focus.
-
•
An innovation studio led by an entrepreneurial manager and backed by strategic leadership and funding can overcome common innovation obstacles.
-
•
Disruptive innovation teams need to be small, cross-functional, and entrepreneurial, with ownership of their ideas, including equity participation.
-
•
Transparency and public exposure of both successes and failures within the innovation studio build a culture of learning and trust.
-
•
Long term commitment (18 months to 3 years) and organizational patience are critical for disruptive innovation to yield results.
Notable Quotes
"These are all attempts by large companies to figure out new ways to deliver their products or services or to create new businesses outside of what they’re currently working on."
"Innovation is not a spice that you sprinkle on and suddenly magical new things come out."
"Disruptive innovation is about changing customer behavior, not shipping features."
"Hackathons are a fun activity to spend some creative time together and then go back to making the stuff that we normally make."
"Innovation labs don’t work because their mission is to be innovative, not necessarily to solve real customer problems."
"Nordstrom decided that innovation needed to be a corporate value, not a lab value."
"Adobe’s Kickbox is a fantastic professional development tool, but it doesn’t drive new lines of business."
"The innovation studio bakes in strategic vision, leadership, funding, and ownership."
"The team that comes up with the winning idea leaves the studio with equity and carries the idea forward."
"Disruptive innovation doesn’t happen overnight; you have to practice, fail, learn, and have patience."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If diversity alone made research inclusive, then police could never be anti-black because they include black officers."
Victor UdoewaBeyond Methods and Diversity: The Roots of Inclusion
March 26, 2024
"Every few years consultants come in and tidy up our mess, but as soon as they leave, we mess it all up again."
Peter MorvilleThe Architecture of Understanding
May 13, 2015
"Sometimes you’re too early. Don’t fear. File this away and keep your powder dry."
Sam LadnerHow Research Can Drive Strategic Foresight
March 9, 2022
"Over a third of the company signed in shortly after launch, which felt like a great success."
Michelle Bejian Lotia Anne-Marie MorellRolling Out a Repository: How Zapier Centralizes Insights from Across their Organization
March 28, 2023
"At Atlassian, many confident non-researchers were already doing lots of research, which was an opportunity and a challenge."
Leisa ReicheltOpening Keynote: Operating in Context
November 7, 2018
"We created a Wizard of Oz smoke and mirrors prototype—a simple text message thread between a parent and this service—just to get enough buy-in."
Sarah GallimoreInspire Progress with Artifacts from the Future
November 18, 2022
"The secondary first, primary second sequence may seem a numerical mismatch, but it is the way to go."
Joerg Beringer Thomas GeisScaling User Research with AI: Continuous Discovery of User Needs in Minutes
September 10, 2025
"Team leadership means managing down to empower your team, managing across to build stakeholder relationships, and managing up with executives."
Peter MerholzCustomer-Centered Design Organizations
June 8, 2017
"If you understand their language—gross merchandising value, monthly recurring revenue, daily active users—you speak their world."
Dalia El-ShimySo You've Got a Seat at the Table. Now What?
March 31, 2020
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What governance is necessary to manage AI prototyping that impacts design systems, code, and performance?
How might designers begin to collectively imagine alternatives to the current precarious system?
What skills are essential for designers to communicate effectively with AI to achieve meaningful outputs?