Summary
In this talk, Jeff Gothelf discusses the widespread corporate pursuit of innovation in the face of disruption from nimble startups. Using examples like New Coke, Amazon Fire Phone, and Nordstrom's innovation lab, Jeff highlights how many large companies misunderstand innovation as a quick fix or a side project. He distinguishes between sustaining innovation, which improves existing products, and disruptive innovation, which creates entirely new business models leveraging core competencies. Jeff critiques popular corporate innovation efforts such as hackathons and innovation labs, explaining why they often fail due to lack of strategic alignment, incentives, ownership, and integration with core business units. Drawing on his experience at AOL and examples from Adobe’s Kickbox initiative, Jeff presents the innovation studio as a superior approach. This studio integrates leadership, long-term funding, cross-functional entrepreneurial teams, radical transparency, and genuine ownership—where teams take equity and carry winning ideas into new business lines or spinouts. He emphasizes patience of 18 months to three years and the need to publicly share both successes and failures to build a culture of experimentation. Jeff concludes that an innovation studio not only drives disruptive innovation outcomes but also improves sustaining innovation practices across the enterprise.
Key Insights
-
•
Many high-profile corporate innovation failures (e.g., New Coke, Amazon Fire Phone) stem from misunderstanding innovation as a superficial add-on rather than a strategic practice.
-
•
Disruptive innovation differs fundamentally from sustaining innovation; it focuses on creating new business models, not just shipping features.
-
•
Hackathons, while popular, are short-term events that rarely result in meaningful disruptive innovation due to lack of ongoing incentives and integration.
-
•
Innovation labs often fail because they operate in isolation from corporate strategy and struggle to hand off ideas to productization teams incentivized differently.
-
•
Nordstrom and eBay both shut down innovation labs to instead embed innovation as a corporate-wide value.
-
•
Adobe’s Kickbox program encourages experimentation across employees but falls short for disruptive innovation as it is part-time and lacks strategic focus.
-
•
An innovation studio led by an entrepreneurial manager and backed by strategic leadership and funding can overcome common innovation obstacles.
-
•
Disruptive innovation teams need to be small, cross-functional, and entrepreneurial, with ownership of their ideas, including equity participation.
-
•
Transparency and public exposure of both successes and failures within the innovation studio build a culture of learning and trust.
-
•
Long term commitment (18 months to 3 years) and organizational patience are critical for disruptive innovation to yield results.
Notable Quotes
"These are all attempts by large companies to figure out new ways to deliver their products or services or to create new businesses outside of what they’re currently working on."
"Innovation is not a spice that you sprinkle on and suddenly magical new things come out."
"Disruptive innovation is about changing customer behavior, not shipping features."
"Hackathons are a fun activity to spend some creative time together and then go back to making the stuff that we normally make."
"Innovation labs don’t work because their mission is to be innovative, not necessarily to solve real customer problems."
"Nordstrom decided that innovation needed to be a corporate value, not a lab value."
"Adobe’s Kickbox is a fantastic professional development tool, but it doesn’t drive new lines of business."
"The innovation studio bakes in strategic vision, leadership, funding, and ownership."
"The team that comes up with the winning idea leaves the studio with equity and carries the idea forward."
"Disruptive innovation doesn’t happen overnight; you have to practice, fail, learn, and have patience."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If you have to learn a workaround, you want to learn it once and reuse it again and again."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
June 7, 2023
"The system encourages growth not just in craft but also in client engagement and team collaboration."
Ignacio MartinezFair and Effective Designer Evaluation
September 25, 2024
"Design pairs gave strength in numbers, faster turnarounds, and more impact especially when paired with product managers."
Sarah Kinkade Mariana Ortiz-ReyesDesign Management Models in the Face of Transformation
June 8, 2022
"Psychological warmth and physical warmth activate the same part of the brain, the insula."
Daniel GloydWarming the User Experience: Lessons from America's first and most radical human-centered designers
May 9, 2024
"Finding meaningful insights is not just casting a wide net—it requires discipline, structure, and knowing where to fish."
Patrick BoehlerFishing for Real Needs: Reimagining Journalism Needs with AI
June 10, 2025
"Anyone can do a basic AI summary with zero control, but we offer robust, evidence-backed, scalable chat analysis."
Andy Barraclough Betsy NelsonFrom Costly Complexity to Efficient Insights: Why UX Teams Are Switching To Voxpopme
September 23, 2024
"Policy is ideally driven by values, while UX in the private sector is driven by delight and profit."
Alexandra SchmidtWhy Ethics Can't Save Tech
November 18, 2022
"A lot of DevOps is about empathy — doing our piece but thinking about the larger connection."
Louis RosenfeldDiscussion: What Operations can teach DesignOps
November 6, 2017
"We’re literally using AI to help AI build AI, including bias detection and correction in the process."
Mitchell BernsteinOrganizing Chaos: How IBM is Defining Design Systems with Sketch for an Ever-Changing AI Landscape
September 29, 2021
