Summary
In this talk, Jeff Gothelf discusses the widespread corporate pursuit of innovation in the face of disruption from nimble startups. Using examples like New Coke, Amazon Fire Phone, and Nordstrom's innovation lab, Jeff highlights how many large companies misunderstand innovation as a quick fix or a side project. He distinguishes between sustaining innovation, which improves existing products, and disruptive innovation, which creates entirely new business models leveraging core competencies. Jeff critiques popular corporate innovation efforts such as hackathons and innovation labs, explaining why they often fail due to lack of strategic alignment, incentives, ownership, and integration with core business units. Drawing on his experience at AOL and examples from Adobe’s Kickbox initiative, Jeff presents the innovation studio as a superior approach. This studio integrates leadership, long-term funding, cross-functional entrepreneurial teams, radical transparency, and genuine ownership—where teams take equity and carry winning ideas into new business lines or spinouts. He emphasizes patience of 18 months to three years and the need to publicly share both successes and failures to build a culture of experimentation. Jeff concludes that an innovation studio not only drives disruptive innovation outcomes but also improves sustaining innovation practices across the enterprise.
Key Insights
-
•
Many high-profile corporate innovation failures (e.g., New Coke, Amazon Fire Phone) stem from misunderstanding innovation as a superficial add-on rather than a strategic practice.
-
•
Disruptive innovation differs fundamentally from sustaining innovation; it focuses on creating new business models, not just shipping features.
-
•
Hackathons, while popular, are short-term events that rarely result in meaningful disruptive innovation due to lack of ongoing incentives and integration.
-
•
Innovation labs often fail because they operate in isolation from corporate strategy and struggle to hand off ideas to productization teams incentivized differently.
-
•
Nordstrom and eBay both shut down innovation labs to instead embed innovation as a corporate-wide value.
-
•
Adobe’s Kickbox program encourages experimentation across employees but falls short for disruptive innovation as it is part-time and lacks strategic focus.
-
•
An innovation studio led by an entrepreneurial manager and backed by strategic leadership and funding can overcome common innovation obstacles.
-
•
Disruptive innovation teams need to be small, cross-functional, and entrepreneurial, with ownership of their ideas, including equity participation.
-
•
Transparency and public exposure of both successes and failures within the innovation studio build a culture of learning and trust.
-
•
Long term commitment (18 months to 3 years) and organizational patience are critical for disruptive innovation to yield results.
Notable Quotes
"These are all attempts by large companies to figure out new ways to deliver their products or services or to create new businesses outside of what they’re currently working on."
"Innovation is not a spice that you sprinkle on and suddenly magical new things come out."
"Disruptive innovation is about changing customer behavior, not shipping features."
"Hackathons are a fun activity to spend some creative time together and then go back to making the stuff that we normally make."
"Innovation labs don’t work because their mission is to be innovative, not necessarily to solve real customer problems."
"Nordstrom decided that innovation needed to be a corporate value, not a lab value."
"Adobe’s Kickbox is a fantastic professional development tool, but it doesn’t drive new lines of business."
"The innovation studio bakes in strategic vision, leadership, funding, and ownership."
"The team that comes up with the winning idea leaves the studio with equity and carries the idea forward."
"Disruptive innovation doesn’t happen overnight; you have to practice, fail, learn, and have patience."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Retraumatization means when someone is reminded of a trauma, they relive it all over again as if it was happening in that exact moment."
Carol Scott Melissa EgglestonAvoid Harming Your Team and Users: Promoting Care and Brand Reputation with Trauma-Informed UX Practices
February 5, 2025
"Understanding how assistive technology evolves is crucial because it foretells the future of interface design."
Lija Hogan Milan Mijatovic Sam Proulx Louis RosenfeldThree Years Out: Perspectives on the Near-Term Future of User Research
March 15, 2024
"The cognitive load saved by not having to manage security software on mobile phones is a huge accessibility win."
Sam ProulxMobile Accessibility and You
June 9, 2022
"We evaluate the work and not the amount of hours."
Ana FerreiraDesigning Distributed: Leading Doist’s Fully Remote Design Team in Six Countries
January 8, 2024
"Working with these tools requires new workflows and checkpoints to validate and tweak the AI's output."
Jorge ArangoScale Smart: AI-Powered Content Organization Strategies
September 24, 2024
"Using work structure as a taxonomy for knowledge failed due to frequent reorganizations; switching to a jobs-to-be-done taxonomy gave us stability."
Chris MosesStretching the Definition of DesignOps with Product Development
November 7, 2018
"When you’re building a specific AI feature, you don’t want to make your user write their own prompt."
Trisha Causley[Demo] Complexity in disguise: Crafting experiences for generative AI features
June 5, 2024
"I really want to be able to sign off on decisions and make sure that I’m preserving my agency as a UX professional."
Clara Kliman-SilverUX Futures: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Design
June 7, 2023
"Single sign-on was going to be really important because I didn’t want any barrier entry for people."
Michael PolivkaScaling Design through Relationship Maps
November 7, 2017
