Summary
In this talk, Jeff Gothelf discusses the widespread corporate pursuit of innovation in the face of disruption from nimble startups. Using examples like New Coke, Amazon Fire Phone, and Nordstrom's innovation lab, Jeff highlights how many large companies misunderstand innovation as a quick fix or a side project. He distinguishes between sustaining innovation, which improves existing products, and disruptive innovation, which creates entirely new business models leveraging core competencies. Jeff critiques popular corporate innovation efforts such as hackathons and innovation labs, explaining why they often fail due to lack of strategic alignment, incentives, ownership, and integration with core business units. Drawing on his experience at AOL and examples from Adobe’s Kickbox initiative, Jeff presents the innovation studio as a superior approach. This studio integrates leadership, long-term funding, cross-functional entrepreneurial teams, radical transparency, and genuine ownership—where teams take equity and carry winning ideas into new business lines or spinouts. He emphasizes patience of 18 months to three years and the need to publicly share both successes and failures to build a culture of experimentation. Jeff concludes that an innovation studio not only drives disruptive innovation outcomes but also improves sustaining innovation practices across the enterprise.
Key Insights
-
•
Many high-profile corporate innovation failures (e.g., New Coke, Amazon Fire Phone) stem from misunderstanding innovation as a superficial add-on rather than a strategic practice.
-
•
Disruptive innovation differs fundamentally from sustaining innovation; it focuses on creating new business models, not just shipping features.
-
•
Hackathons, while popular, are short-term events that rarely result in meaningful disruptive innovation due to lack of ongoing incentives and integration.
-
•
Innovation labs often fail because they operate in isolation from corporate strategy and struggle to hand off ideas to productization teams incentivized differently.
-
•
Nordstrom and eBay both shut down innovation labs to instead embed innovation as a corporate-wide value.
-
•
Adobe’s Kickbox program encourages experimentation across employees but falls short for disruptive innovation as it is part-time and lacks strategic focus.
-
•
An innovation studio led by an entrepreneurial manager and backed by strategic leadership and funding can overcome common innovation obstacles.
-
•
Disruptive innovation teams need to be small, cross-functional, and entrepreneurial, with ownership of their ideas, including equity participation.
-
•
Transparency and public exposure of both successes and failures within the innovation studio build a culture of learning and trust.
-
•
Long term commitment (18 months to 3 years) and organizational patience are critical for disruptive innovation to yield results.
Notable Quotes
"These are all attempts by large companies to figure out new ways to deliver their products or services or to create new businesses outside of what they’re currently working on."
"Innovation is not a spice that you sprinkle on and suddenly magical new things come out."
"Disruptive innovation is about changing customer behavior, not shipping features."
"Hackathons are a fun activity to spend some creative time together and then go back to making the stuff that we normally make."
"Innovation labs don’t work because their mission is to be innovative, not necessarily to solve real customer problems."
"Nordstrom decided that innovation needed to be a corporate value, not a lab value."
"Adobe’s Kickbox is a fantastic professional development tool, but it doesn’t drive new lines of business."
"The innovation studio bakes in strategic vision, leadership, funding, and ownership."
"The team that comes up with the winning idea leaves the studio with equity and carries the idea forward."
"Disruptive innovation doesn’t happen overnight; you have to practice, fail, learn, and have patience."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Everything is a prototype."
Doug PowellClosing Keynote: Design at Scale
November 8, 2018
"Power dynamics exist in every session. People don’t want to be embarrassed or feel put on the spot."
Mila Kuznetsova Lucy DentonHow Lessons Learned from Our Youngest Users Can Help Us Evolve our Practices
March 9, 2022
"If we’re really centering it on people and experiences, consider life before place, and place before technology."
Sarah GallimoreInspire Progress with Artifacts from the Future
November 18, 2022
"Stakeholders start demanding better digital experiences at work because they expect the same quality they have at home."
Lada Gorlenko Sharbani Dhar Sébastien Malo Rob Mitzel Ivana Ng Michal Anne RogondinoTheme 1: Discussion
January 8, 2024
"Start tinkering, playing around, and pushing AI’s limits because the industry shift is going to get faster."
Alnie FigueroaThe Future of Design Operations: Transforming Our Craft
September 10, 2025
"Driver modeling tells you which research initiatives matter most based on their impact on key outcome metrics."
Landon BarnesAre My Research Findings Actually Meaningful?
March 10, 2022
"We have the Big C and the Little C: our external customers and our salespeople using the tools every day."
Emily EagleCan't Rewind: Radio and Retail
June 3, 2019
"Managing resistance is mental; customers might resist because they've learned workarounds with legacy systems."
Malini RaoLessons Learned from a 4-year Product Re-platforming Journey
June 9, 2021
"Designers are often seen as bottlenecks because our work is harder to estimate and track than engineering’s."
Asia HoePartnering with Product: A Journey from Junior to Senior Design
November 29, 2023
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What tools can non-leaders use to support an organizational shift toward outcome-driven performance?
How can a repeatable market entry framework help reduce launch delays in multi-country B2B expansions?
How can service design artifacts like customer journey maps risk becoming just check-box exercises?