The GE Design System and Thoughts about Craft at Scale
Summary
Dave, head of a 50-person UX team at GE software, recounts how they tackled massive design challenges in a huge, decentralized company by developing a modular design system. Starting in 2011 under the leadership of Greg Petrov, their team was small but ambitious, aiming to bring consistent user experiences to thousands of software developers scattered throughout GE’s vast industrial ecosystem. Inspired by traditional industrial design and presentations like Mike Lemmon’s on interaction design languages, they shifted from rigid style guides to flexible, Lego-like toolkits for design and development. Collaborating with Frog Design experts such as Robert Fabricant and Ed Hicks, Dave’s team built a broadly adopted system focused on accelerating development, enabling better prototyping, and supporting consistency without stifling creativity. They discovered that their early system needed better governance, clearer usage guidelines, and easier extensibility, especially as teams demanded variations for marketing and healthcare applications. Today, GE’s UX organization in San Ramon has scaled to 60 designers integrated into cross-functional teams, evolving their design system with richer user insights and technology improvements. Central to their craft is co-creation, rapid prototyping, and maintaining shared understanding with stakeholders, all while continuing to refine the system to support complex industrial data visualization and brand coherence.
Key Insights
-
•
GE’s design challenges stem from being a decentralized matrix with 40,000 developers but fewer than 20 UX designers initially.
-
•
The team shifted from style guides to a Lego-like design system emphasizing tools, not rules, to drive adoption among developers.
-
•
Partnership with Frog Design brought valuable expertise in creating scalable, modular design systems for GE.
-
•
The design system accelerated software development by answering recurring UI questions and providing pre-built components.
-
•
The team saw early success with nearly 20,000 downloads inside GE for the design system, signaling wide adoption.
-
•
Despite adoption, the team acknowledged weaknesses like multiple confusing tab patterns and difficulty extending the system.
-
•
Healthcare and marketing teams created variations for empathy and communication needs, showing design system adaptability.
-
•
Sketches by Hey Studio became effective co-creation tools for storytelling and aligning stakeholders around user needs.
-
•
Moving from an isolated UX studio to embedded, cross-functional teams increased design’s influence across product delivery.
-
•
The evolving craft of UX at GE emphasizes rapid prototyping, co-creation, and shared understanding over just polished visuals.
Notable Quotes
"We landed on the mantra of tools, not rules to drive adoption with developers."
"If we could make something really easy for developers, we would drive adoption and continually improve user experiences."
"We didn’t have enough knowledge initially to have a strong opinion about what was good design for these users."
"A lot of people were just going and downloading the tear sheet, which is to be expected."
"We found that different failure modes of equipment have different spatial signatures on spider web charts."
"The most important thing about the design system is that it’s already coded — designers and devs just use it."
"It’s very tempting to bypass the sketching step and jump straight to high-fidelity prototypes — proceed with caution."
"We resisted the temptation to squash diversity of usage because we thought we’d learn from it."
"Prototyping and co-creation workshops have been a huge accelerant to the design process."
"Our craft today is about forming shared understanding and building prototypes, not just delivering polished visuals."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Junior engineers often resent having to create OKRs that feel disconnected from their day-to-day work."
Bria Alexander Benson Low Natalya Pemberton Stephanie GoldthorpeOKRs—Helpful or Harmful?
January 20, 2022
"The team that comes up with the winning idea leaves the studio with equity and carries the idea forward."
Jeff GothelfInnovation Studios: the Engines of Enterprise Experimentation
May 14, 2015
"Our research operations team’s mission is to let researchers focus on research without worrying about operational details."
Wyatt HaymanGlobal Research Panels
August 8, 2020
"We encourage teams to build simulated persona testing into regular rituals—daily, weekly, or quarterly—to continuously refine messaging."
Gillian Salerno-Rebic Mark MicheliFrom Insight to Impact: How JourneySpark Used WEVO Pulse + Pro to Drive a 50% Lift in Ad Engagement
June 11, 2025
"People need to trust governments before they can trust digital governments."
Yalenka Mariën Marie MervaillieDesigning for Digital Inclusion in the Belgian Government
December 8, 2021
"Many companies view design operations as a nice to have, rather than essential, making these roles prime targets in layoffs."
Angelos ArnisNavigating the Rapid Shifts in Tech's Turbulent Terrain
October 2, 2023
"Understaffing is consistent in design ops no matter where in the world you are."
Benjamin RealMaturity Models: A Core Tool for Creating a DesignOps Strategy
October 1, 2021
"Germany is a large federation with 16 federal states and an additional European Union layer, making digital service delivery quite complex."
Magdalena ZadaraZero Hour: How to Get Far Quickly When Starting Your Digital Service Unit Late
November 16, 2022
"Designing for edge cases can lead to solutions everyone wants to use because they’re more comfortable and inclusive."
Billy CarlsonIdeation tips for Product Managers
December 6, 2022
