Summary
Dave, head of a 50-person UX team at GE software, recounts how they tackled massive design challenges in a huge, decentralized company by developing a modular design system. Starting in 2011 under the leadership of Greg Petrov, their team was small but ambitious, aiming to bring consistent user experiences to thousands of software developers scattered throughout GE’s vast industrial ecosystem. Inspired by traditional industrial design and presentations like Mike Lemmon’s on interaction design languages, they shifted from rigid style guides to flexible, Lego-like toolkits for design and development. Collaborating with Frog Design experts such as Robert Fabricant and Ed Hicks, Dave’s team built a broadly adopted system focused on accelerating development, enabling better prototyping, and supporting consistency without stifling creativity. They discovered that their early system needed better governance, clearer usage guidelines, and easier extensibility, especially as teams demanded variations for marketing and healthcare applications. Today, GE’s UX organization in San Ramon has scaled to 60 designers integrated into cross-functional teams, evolving their design system with richer user insights and technology improvements. Central to their craft is co-creation, rapid prototyping, and maintaining shared understanding with stakeholders, all while continuing to refine the system to support complex industrial data visualization and brand coherence.
Key Insights
-
•
GE’s design challenges stem from being a decentralized matrix with 40,000 developers but fewer than 20 UX designers initially.
-
•
The team shifted from style guides to a Lego-like design system emphasizing tools, not rules, to drive adoption among developers.
-
•
Partnership with Frog Design brought valuable expertise in creating scalable, modular design systems for GE.
-
•
The design system accelerated software development by answering recurring UI questions and providing pre-built components.
-
•
The team saw early success with nearly 20,000 downloads inside GE for the design system, signaling wide adoption.
-
•
Despite adoption, the team acknowledged weaknesses like multiple confusing tab patterns and difficulty extending the system.
-
•
Healthcare and marketing teams created variations for empathy and communication needs, showing design system adaptability.
-
•
Sketches by Hey Studio became effective co-creation tools for storytelling and aligning stakeholders around user needs.
-
•
Moving from an isolated UX studio to embedded, cross-functional teams increased design’s influence across product delivery.
-
•
The evolving craft of UX at GE emphasizes rapid prototyping, co-creation, and shared understanding over just polished visuals.
Notable Quotes
"We landed on the mantra of tools, not rules to drive adoption with developers."
"If we could make something really easy for developers, we would drive adoption and continually improve user experiences."
"We didn’t have enough knowledge initially to have a strong opinion about what was good design for these users."
"A lot of people were just going and downloading the tear sheet, which is to be expected."
"We found that different failure modes of equipment have different spatial signatures on spider web charts."
"The most important thing about the design system is that it’s already coded — designers and devs just use it."
"It’s very tempting to bypass the sketching step and jump straight to high-fidelity prototypes — proceed with caution."
"We resisted the temptation to squash diversity of usage because we thought we’d learn from it."
"Prototyping and co-creation workshops have been a huge accelerant to the design process."
"Our craft today is about forming shared understanding and building prototypes, not just delivering polished visuals."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Enterprise UX is really hard because, in addition to designing for products, we also design for our own change and the change our colleagues navigate."
Boon Yew ChewMaking Sense of Systems—and Using Systems to Make Sense of the Enterprise
June 6, 2023
"Design system decision records prevent knowledge being stuck in one person’s head."
Dan DonaldDesign Systems as a Vehicle for Systemic Change
June 1, 2023
"Corporate leaders don’t know how to integrate design leaders beyond the design org."
Fatimah RichmondThe Future of ReOps as a Strategic Function: A Roadmap for Getting There
March 25, 2024
"Designers are uniquely entitled to critique—it’s a privilege to rigorously improve craft while others might envy that process."
Joseph MeersmanSweating the Pixel: Scaling Quality through Critique
June 10, 2021
"A little extra work goes a long way, sometimes you just have to spend time to save time."
Melinda BelcherBridging the Gap: Making the Most of the Differences Between Agency and Enterprise
January 8, 2024
"Theory at its most fundamental just means if something A happens, then something B will happen."
Uday Gajendar Adam RichardsonFrom AI to Zeitgeist: Theory as the design antidote to AI hype
March 27, 2025
"Procurement in local government favors old, single-sale products, making adoption of new services challenging despite long-term savings."
Laura Smith Tom GaylerEmbedding Service Design and Agile Practice within UK Planning Teams to Create Services that Last
December 3, 2024
"You don’t have to become a manager or director to advance; becoming a principal IC role is equally influential."
Catt Small Micah Bennett Brian Carr Jessica HarlleeWhat's Next for ICs: Exploring Staff and Principal Designer Roles
February 22, 2024
"The promise of an LLM assistant requires users to build new mental models while using it."
Katie JohnsonDisrupting generative AI products with just-in-time consumer insights
June 4, 2024
