Rosenverse

Tools are moments. Capabilities compound.

Gold
Tuesday, June 9, 2026 • Designing with AI 2026

This video is featured in the AI Conference playlist.

Share the love for this talk
Tools are moments. Capabilities compound.
Speakers: Vanessa Varin
Link:

Summary

As design organizations race to adopt AI, many still measure readiness through tool fluency — who can use ChatGPT, Claude, or Figma Make the fastest. But tools, as we’ve learned, are ephemeral. The deeper challenge is defining the durable human capabilities that remain valuable as AI fundamentally reshapes design work.

This talk explores a new approach to AI readiness for design organizations: moving beyond tool proficiency to identify the underlying skills, competencies, and capabilities that scale across changing technologies. We’ll examine the distinction between skills and capabilities, the process of building an AI capability framework for design, and how we’re mapping designers against those competencies to establish a baseline and path forward.

This session offers a practical, human-centered model for building resilient, AI-augmented design organizations — grounded in durable capability, not temporary tooling trends.

Key Insights

  • •

    Measuring AI fluency by tool usage is insufficient and often misleading; focusing on human judgment and observable behaviors offers deeper understanding.

  • •

    Vanessa distinguishes between skills (tool-specific, ephemeral), competencies (applied judgment using multiple skills), and capabilities (umbrella outcomes across competencies).

  • •

    A capability framework with six core areas and 21 competencies was built collaboratively with hundreds of Amazon design practitioners across roles.

  • •

    Creative exploration, quality and responsibility, insight and synthesis, systems and architecture, learning and adaptability, and AI-human collaboration are the framework’s six key capabilities.

  • •

    Gamified assessments with about 30 questions allow designers to baseline their fluency, receive diagnostics, and get an actionable growth map.

  • •

    Frequency of AI tool use doesn’t equate to fluency; depth of skill integration and confidence in directing AI matter much more.

  • •

    Patterns show common gaps in quality and responsibility and systems thinking, which are areas for targeted learning and development investments.

  • •

    Role assumptions are challenged—design program managers aren’t always stronger in systems thinking, for example, revealing real-world variance and learning needs.

  • •

    Providing a shared vocabulary around AI fluency helps practitioners articulate and connect their evolving AI skills beyond specific tools.

  • •

    Baseline assessments need to be challenging enough to create a growth ceiling, balancing accuracy and aspirational goal setting without skewing results.

Notable Quotes

"I actually don’t need to feel ready to learn, and I can be uncomfortable or scared and still learn."

"It feels like we’ve forgotten to ask what the humans were actually building while chasing the tools."

"The difference is putting the human and their agency back into the mix with the question: What can you do with AI?"

"Fluency is how deeply you can work with AI—the judgment and direction you bring, not just how often you use it."

"The skills are tied to the tool and ephemeral; capabilities are what belong to us and travel with us as tools change."

"We wanted to create something that’s not just a survey but a robust, gamified experience to baseline current skills and provide a growth map."

"We’re focusing on observable behaviors and outcomes, not specific tools or time saved, to measure AI fluency."

"Everyone is learning and evolving right now; they just need language and frameworks to name what they’re growing."

"If the bar is too low, everyone looks very capable, and that doesn’t help growth or trust in the mapping."

"AI is the instrument. You all are the musicians. Build the capabilities that make quality music."

Ask the Rosenbot
Joi Freeman
A New Vantage Point: Building a Pipeline for Multifaceted Research(ers)
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Christian Crumlish
Afternoon Insights Panel
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Lily Aduana
5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Elana Chapman
Getting started with accessibility research
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Janelle Estes
UX Research Trends
2021 • Advancing Research Community
Peter Van Dijck
Hands on AI #3: Claude Code for UX people
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Xenia Adjoubei
Empowering Communities Through the Researcher in Residence Program
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Kristin Taylor
Building Bridges Across Organizational Silos
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Chris Geison
Theme Two Intro
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Nicole Aleong
What UX research can learn from other research practices [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Joerg Beringer
Scaling User Research with AI: Continuous Discovery of User Needs in Minutes
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Alison Rand
Scaling Impact with Service Design
2021 • DesignOps Community
Frances Yllana
DesignOps Exposed: What do our peers really think of us?
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Kim Fellman Cohen
Measuring the Designer Experience
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
How to Identify and Increase your "Experience Quotient"
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Greg Baker
Exploring What Decades of Expertise Can Do Outside a Traditional Tech Role
2026 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Marc Fonteijn

"People who work in-house tend to be more satisfied with their salary compared to those on the agency side."

Marc Fonteijn

First Insights from the 2025 Service Design Salary(+) Report

December 4, 2024

Sarah Williams

"We want these principles to be broad and channel-agnostic so they can be applied across all teams, not just designers."

Sarah Williams

Verizon_A Framework for CX Transformation

January 8, 2024

Sofia Quintero

"It’s very difficult to align researcher goals with business growth, but that’s exactly what we try to do."

Sofia Quintero

The Product Philosophy Behind EnjoyHQ

March 10, 2021

Sarah Williams

"Our design group is positioned under marketing, which informs who champions and promotes design within the company."

Sarah Williams

A Framework for CX Transformation

June 11, 2021

Robert Fabricant

"We know what is not good research, but defining and communicating what good research looks like is more challenging."

Robert Fabricant Peter Merholz Noam Segal Teresa Torres

A Genuine Conversation about the Future of UX Research

March 20, 2024

Dante Guintu

"Candidates sometimes got rejected within hours despite active recruiting efforts, and recruiters lacked visibility into the system issues."

Dante Guintu

How to Crush the Talent Crunch

September 8, 2022

Jennifer Fraser

"In our haste to get answers quickly, we often ignore what system we’re working within and why."

Jennifer Fraser

What would Emmy Noether Do? Math, Models and Mulling in UX Research

March 29, 2023

Maria Giudice

"During grief, our creative mind shuts down; fear, safety and security rule the day."

Maria Giudice

Empowering change: Reigniting purpose, passion and impact in research

March 13, 2025

Audrey Crane

"If your engineers are stretched, why not resource design better to increase overall velocity?"

Audrey Crane

Shadow Design–Where Else is Design Happening in Your Organization?

April 20, 2023