Theme 1 Intro
Summary
In this talk, Gem reflects on the challenges faced by the knowledge and product fields amid fast-paced technological, economic, and informational upheaval. Referencing Maggie Gyllenhaal's film The Bride as a metaphor, she highlights how many find themselves in unfamiliar, overwhelming worlds not of their own making. Gem insists that professionals — including researchers, designers, and product thinkers — face a choice: adapt superficially to the noise or stand firm on their core identity as sensemakers and advocates. She emphasizes that small acts of defiance, encapsulated in the phrase 'I would prefer not to,' empower individuals to reclaim agency and clarity. Despite pressures such as the rise of AI, data overload, and organizational shifts, the core essence of this work remains: interpreting information with clarity and advocating for the people behind the data. Gem introduces fellow speakers like Dana, Kurt, Tara, Jared, and Kelly who will expand on these themes including democratization, AI’s impact, and intergenerational dialogue. Ultimately, Gem urges the audience to root themselves in their values and confidently say 'I would prefer not to' as a way to cultivate resilience and purpose in uncertain times.
Key Insights
-
•
The current knowledge ecosystem is overloaded with signals, mixing opinion with evidence, which demands sharper sensemaking skills.
-
•
Small, quiet acts of defiance like saying 'I would prefer not to' reclaim personal and professional agency.
-
•
Core identity as sensemakers and advocates remains stable even as the environment and tools evolve rapidly.
-
•
The rise of AI and technology introduces new challenges but also underscores the enduring need for human-centered advocacy.
-
•
Holistic sensemaking, integrating research, design, product, and systems thinking, is increasingly valuable amidst changing organizational roles.
-
•
Advocating for the human experience behind data is essential and perennial, not a luxury.
-
•
Facing macroeconomic and technological upheavals requires doubling down on foundational principles, not capitulating to noise.
-
•
The phrase 'I would prefer not to' symbolizes a thoughtful refusal to surrender values to external pressures.
-
•
Interdisciplinary skills position professionals to lead adaptation without abandoning core professional identity.
-
•
Community and shared dialogue, exemplified by upcoming speakers like Dana and Kurt, are key to navigating this moment.
Notable Quotes
"I would prefer not to is the kind of world many of us find ourselves in right now."
"Every time we say, I would prefer not to, we reclaim a little bit of agency."
"Defiance is not loud or theatrical; it is bravery and clarity."
"We are sensemakers. No matter what data we are given, we make sense of it."
"Advocating for human experience is not a luxury. It is essential, and it is perennial."
"Our job is to make sure the people making decisions actually listen."
"The skills we hold are exactly the skills that this moment requires."
"Anchor yourself in what you know to be right and true."
"Holistic sensemaking matters."
"I would prefer not to reduce human understanding to shallow sound bites."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We made a thing an actual thing. It’s a book called Closing the Loop: Systems Thinking for Designers."
Sheryl CababaExpanding your Design Lens with Systems Thinking
March 28, 2023
"Instead of aiming for 80% consistency, I believe 30-40% consistency with 60-70% freedom works better."
Prerna MakanawalaAchieving Balanced Design Consistency
June 9, 2021
"My manager says never ask me to take a day off, just tell me — it’s a huge cultural shift."
Allison SandersOperating with Purpose
January 8, 2024
"By connecting complex user journeys to queries, we made the impact on business bottom lines explicit and compelling."
Mac SmithMeasuring Up: Using Product Research for Organizational Impact
March 12, 2021
"Drag and drop ease, and collaborative affinity diagramming in the tool, were unexpected but very welcome advantages."
Taylor Jennings Joe Nelson Alex KnollRepository Retrospective: Learnings from Introducing a Central Place for UX Research
March 9, 2022
"At the beginning, academic designers give their best guesses for scope, but those numbers rarely hold."
Kristin Sundermeyer Tygre MorehartDesign Ops Metrics
September 30, 2021
"We can make this thing go faster, more people can access it, but we can have benefits for the planet as well."
James ChudleyDecarbonising User Journeys: How minimising enables us to do more with less
February 19, 2025
"The big design activity here is sketching prompts, guiding how the AI should behave rather than drawing UI."
Josh Clark Veronika KindredSentient Scenes and Radically Adaptive Experiences
June 11, 2025
"The best experiences are the ones that start to be relevant around who we are, recognizing where we are and what we’re trying to accomplish."
Greg PetroffSoftware as Material—A Redux
June 6, 2023
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How can design guidelines and brand semantics be encoded to help AI and engineering teams work together?
What are common pitfalls when building independent products or services and how to avoid them?
What benefits come from structuring AI personas with detailed roles and boundaries in design workflows?